<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Ruck.Us Blog - Latest Comments</title><link>http://ruckusblog.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://ruckusblog.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 07:13:30 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Retire Rucks</title><link>http://blog.ruck.us/posts/retire-rucks/#comment-704005456</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Glad it now works.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;--&lt;br&gt;Nathan Daschle&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://Ruck.us" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Ruck.us"&gt;Ruck.us&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ruck.us</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 07:13:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Retire Rucks</title><link>http://blog.ruck.us/posts/retire-rucks/#comment-703878078</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, I created an account some time again.  I am physically clumsy and the buttons for register and sign in are right next to each other. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GraceAdams830</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 04:55:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Retire Rucks</title><link>http://blog.ruck.us/posts/retire-rucks/#comment-703877140</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I got into register by mistake.  Now I can't get out of register into sign in which is where I need to go. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GraceAdams830</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 04:54:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Retire Rucks</title><link>http://blog.ruck.us/posts/retire-rucks/#comment-702907675</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Grace - Sorry for your problems.  So can you tell me more about where you are right now?  Have you already created an account?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ruck.us</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 11:58:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Retire Rucks</title><link>http://blog.ruck.us/posts/retire-rucks/#comment-702829149</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I messed up and got into register when I should have gotten into sign in, and now I have trouble getting into read more and the the rucks. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GraceAdams830</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 11:07:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Product Update on Rucks</title><link>http://blog.ruck.us/posts/product-update-on-rucks/#comment-694833230</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"a place where you can product updates"  what now?  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Creartrixsblood</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2012 19:06:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: News: Blog Change</title><link>http://blog.ruck.us/posts/news-blog-change/#comment-657922255</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Looking forward to the new features. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">noahchestnut</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 11:37:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Paul Ryan Matters.</title><link>http://blog.ruck.us/posts/why-paul-ryan-matters/#comment-619248351</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It is really scary because a VP can become our President on the blink of an eye should something happens to the Commander in Chief.  Where is the experience in global matters?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Armand Sardinas</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2012 13:45:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tea Party II</title><link>http://blog.ruck.us/posts/tea-party-ii/#comment-615165873</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why would you look at the Tea Party's national popularity when analyzing the outcome of a primary election in a conservative district of a conservative state? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">demz taters</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2012 22:59:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tea Party II</title><link>http://blog.ruck.us/posts/tea-party-ii/#comment-607481875</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Looking more long-term, many Tea Party candidates become "wait and see/rejectionist" when holding office. This progression from "parties are failing us/congress is failing us" to "I'm going to vote down everything to shrink government" probably won't address the central issues that led to their electoral victory in the first place. It will be interesting to see where this sentiment is at in 2014, 2016 and 2018 and if this will change how legislation is proposed and voted on.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">noahchestnut</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2012 11:16:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Internet Defense League</title><link>http://blog.ruck.us/posts/the-internet-defense-league/#comment-592246352</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Looking forward to seeing the "IDL" signal light shining into the DC sky around U St.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">noahchestnut</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 14:24:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Klein: Why our System is so Broken</title><link>http://blog.ruck.us/posts/klein-why-our-system-is-so-broken/#comment-587193701</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Looking forward to reading it--and seeing what can be done to break through the "motivated reasoning."&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Peter</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 14:26:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Klein: Why our System is so Broken</title><link>http://blog.ruck.us/posts/klein-why-our-system-is-so-broken/#comment-562312517</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If you move the system to a winner-doesn't-take-all system then the groups won't be as threatened by each other and there'd be room for dissent from the party orthodoxies on both sides and the party orthodoxies themselves would become more dynamic as a result!  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Wetzelld</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 19:48:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WI: A Different Read</title><link>http://blog.ruck.us/posts/wi-a-different-read/#comment-550222287</link><description>&lt;p&gt;100% agree. Well said. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Richter10.2 Media </dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2012 16:36:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WI: A Different Read</title><link>http://blog.ruck.us/posts/wi-a-different-read/#comment-548830778</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ruck.us</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2012 11:13:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WI: A Different Read</title><link>http://blog.ruck.us/posts/wi-a-different-read/#comment-548815029</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nathan, really balanced and solid assessment! The partisanship from the Union side supporters went so far beyond mere aggressive campaigning. I think the State Senators who fled rather than take a fair loss set a new and very unfortunate low for legislators. That act of denying a quorum was profoundly undemocratic and unpatriotic. I suspect that many WI voters came to realize that their own legislators had a far greater loyalty to the unions than they did to their own constituents.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ivorb</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2012 10:56:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Americans Elect- The Day After</title><link>http://blog.ruck.us/posts/americans-elect-the-day-after/#comment-532517611</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If you had supported &lt;a href="http://NIFTYTAX.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="NIFTYTAX.com"&gt;NIFTYTAX.com&lt;/a&gt; .... a concept for tax and entitlement reform .... the results would have been different!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Donlloyd</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 18:30:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Americans Elect- The Day After</title><link>http://blog.ruck.us/posts/americans-elect-the-day-after/#comment-532347685</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why not try to fix it?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://anewkindofparty.blogspot.com/2012/05/modest-suggestion-for-americans-elect.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://anewkindofparty.blogspot.com/2012/05/modest-suggestion-for-americans-elect.html"&gt;http://anewkindofparty.blog...&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The kicker is that your system wasn't well designed to get a final winner.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So find a transparent reliable way to get the most centristic solution from among your 7 top contenders...&lt;br&gt;dlw&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Wetzell</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 14:45:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Americans Elect- The Day After</title><link>http://blog.ruck.us/posts/americans-elect-the-day-after/#comment-532290285</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I hope that Americans Elect continues to exist and that it shifts its focus to the 2013, 2014 and 2016 election cycles. Much was accomplished including developing relationships with elections officials in all 50 States.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">WilliamCerf</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 13:40:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Could Obama Have Foregone a Democratic Convention?</title><link>http://blog.ruck.us/posts/could-obama-have-foregone-a-democratic-convention/#comment-530301524</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The only advantage to holding a convention is it gets a lot of free TV time and is a good public kick off to the campaign. However, I doubt that many people really watch the conventions any more. Most of us who would watch are already committed to the candidate. All the disadvantages to holding a convention in a state that is so anti-union, anti-choice, anti-everything probably outweigh any advantage. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SgtCedar</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 10:29:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ruck.us in Mashable</title><link>http://blog.ruck.us/posts/ruck-us-in-mashable/#comment-527821286</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I came here from Mashable. Ironically, the only way to use your service is to have either a Facebook or Twitter account or both, of which I purposefully have neither. So you have to binarily sign-up with these other two "parties", FB or Twitter, in order to NOT choose between the two political parties at your service. Unless, I'm missing something...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dsmith</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 08:35:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Could Obama Have Foregone a Democratic Convention?</title><link>http://blog.ruck.us/posts/could-obama-have-foregone-a-democratic-convention/#comment-524314283</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, at $40 million, a primary with no competing candidates would be only a pep rally and a big waste of money.  The pep rally part he should be able to manage to substitute a public speech for. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Graceadams830</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 08:15:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Could Obama Have Foregone a Democratic Convention?</title><link>http://blog.ruck.us/posts/could-obama-have-foregone-a-democratic-convention/#comment-520512004</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree, Nathan. In fact there are many instances where it would be preferable for President Obama to cut ties with old politics. We are at a place in the political dynamic that begs for a new direction, and the additional payoff would  be how it would completely disorient the Repubs. Pointing out what a waste of money it would be definitely grabs the indies, and a lot of party faithfuls would probably go for it too.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">arthur_caya</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 18:35:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ruck in Action: NORML</title><link>http://blog.ruck.us/posts/ruck-in-action-norml/#comment-510089727</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Vote anti-reform politicians out on their spineless asses!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nogeeksadmin</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 16:53:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ruck in Action: NORML</title><link>http://blog.ruck.us/posts/ruck-in-action-norml/#comment-509955549</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Gotta crawl before you walk..Maybe Reform would be better accepted in dialog with the Lawmakers&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joe Mc Clellan</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 14:24:59 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>